Hill v. Names & Addresses, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that liability under the Consumer Fraud Act is limited to “ ‘conduct that implicates consumer protection con- eerns’ ”
• noting that liability under the Act is limited to ‘“conduct that implicates consumer protection concerns’ ”
• refusing to sever the unlawful clause because the language of the agreement specified provision as “essential” to the rest of the contract
• noting public policy of “ ‘removing all temptation’ ” from fiduciary to breach duty to corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).