Veco Corp. v. Babcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no breach of fiduciary duties where defendants submitted no evidence that certain documents were confidential
• holding that there was no breach of fiduciary duties where defendants submitted no evidence that certain documents were confidential
• holding that the employer had a valid claim for breach of fiduciary duty because the record showed that the defendant employees had actively solicited the customer’s business before they left the plaintiffs employ
• contrasting fiduciary duty owed by employee with that of - 13 - No. 1-18-1551 officer
• contrasting fiduciary duty owed by an employee with that of an officer
• held that actions constituted breach of fiduciary duty where defendants secretly solicited Veco employees for new company and orchestrated a mass exodus following defendants’ resignation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).