Skip to main content
· 4/3/1987

Pain Prevention Lab, Inc. v. Electronic Waveform Labs, Inc.

Citations

  • 657 F. Supp. 1486
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no attorney-client relationship where “it was unreasonable for [the putative client] to believe [he] had an attorney/client relationship”
  • allegations sufficient to state a claim where ■ plaintiff alleged that defendant made misrepresentations “in the marketplace and to actual and/or prospective customers”
  • allegations of misrepresentations concerning approval of a device by the FDA and the existence of a patent which were made “in the marketplace and to actual and/or prospective customers” were sufficient to state a claim under the Consumer Fraud Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.