· 8/3/2006
High v. E-Systems Inc Long
Citations
- 459 F.3d 573
- 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2717
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19613
- 2006 WL 2167224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding rule of contra proferentem only applied when term is ambiguous
- an employer may reduce plan benefits by the amount of the Veterans Administration benefits employees received
- plan administrator may exercise “interpretive discretion” when construing ambiguous terms in ERISA plans
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Stewart, Crane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.