Aaron Gearlds, Jr. v. Entergy Services, Incorporat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that based on the “depth of the Court’s treatment of the issue .., Amara’s pronouncements about surcharge as a potential remedy under § [1132(a)(3) ] should be followed,” even if they could be considered dicta
• noting that the Second Circuit found 50 million large-capacity magazines sufficient for a showing of common use, and that the Fourth Circuit found the same for 8 million AR- and AK-platform semi-automatic rifles
• treating claims for breach of fiduciary duty under § 502(a)(3) and ERISA estoppel as distinct legal claims
• stating, “we give serious consideration to this recent and detailed discussion of the law by a majority of the Supreme Court” and finding it persuasive “[b]ased on the depth of the Court’s treatment of the issue”
• stating, \we give serious consideration to this recent and detailed discussion of the law by a majority of the Supreme Court” and finding it persuasive \[biased on the depth of the Court’s treatment of the issue”
• “Courts must focus on the substance of the relief sought and the allegations pleaded, not on the label used.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).