· 10/7/2010
Cramer v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles
Citations
- 240 P.3d 8
- 126 Nev. 388
- 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 38
- 2010 Nev. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an expert's affidavit is inadmissible when the author has not been qualified 12 or the affidavit fails to state the court wherein he or she was qualified (emphasis added)
- concluding that an expert's affidavit is inadmissible when the author has not been qualified 12 or the affidavit fails to state the court wherein he or she was qualified (emphasis added)
- alleging that 24 Lisps supervisor instructed her to forward ballot to deceased person in California, but providing 25 no evidence that such ballot was returned as voted
- refusing to recognize an unenumerated exception when the statute contained enumerated exceptions
- the district court has wide discretion to determine the admissibility of expert testimony
- \An affidavit is generally inadmissible hearsay.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hardesty, Douglas, Pickering
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.