Skip to main content
· 2/29/2000

Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.

Citations

  • 755 So. 2d 226
  • 2000 WL 225869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ‘the court must not attempt to evaluate the persuasiveness of competing scientific studies’ on summary judgment in performing its gate keeping function
  • noting that ‘the court must not attempt to evaluate the persuasiveness of competing scientific studies’ on summary judgment in performing its gate keeping function
  • in adopting the Daubert standard, court noted that it was also adopting the factors set forth in Daubert
  • and the other applicable evidentiary rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.