Higginson v. Wood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”
• “Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that 25 de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, ‘but not 26 otherwise.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Scheuer v. Rhodes
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
• Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
• Hall v. Bellmon
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-06-03· cited 2,581×
• Grossman v. Novell, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 259×
• Cayman Exploration Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-04-26· cited 192×
• David Farlow v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-02-13· cited 137×
• First City Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association v. Air Capitol Aircraft Sales, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Gary R. Morgan, an Individual
  First Circuit· 1987-06-19· cited 116×
• Boston & Maine Corporation v. Town of Hampton
  First Circuit· 1993-03-05· cited 107×
• Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1989-02-23· cited 55×
• NL Industries, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1986-08-07· cited 38×
• Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1987-12-17· cited 31×
• Nal II, Ltd. v. Tonkin
  D. Kansas· 1989-01-30· cited 29×
• Shaw v. Valdez
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-05-26· cited 28×
• Commander Properties Corp. v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1995-12-05· cited 17×
• Sithon Maritime Co. v. Holiday Mansion
  D. Kansas· 1997-10-22· cited 9×
• Renaissance Center Venture v. Lozovoj
  E.D. Michigan· 1995-05-05· cited 6×
• Traffas v. Bridge Capital Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-01-18· cited 2×