David Farlow v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s decision that the plaintiff had failed to plead the predicate acts of fraud with sufficient'particularity
• affirming dismissal of RICO mail-fraud claim where the plaintiffs could not “determine the exact dates” of the fraudulent mailings made over a period of years
• “Under Rule 9(b), plaintiffs must sufficiently allege each element of a RICO violation and its predicate acts of racketeering with particularity.”
• “Under Rule 9(b), plaintiffs must sufficiently allege each element of a RICO [Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Accordingly, consistent with this District’s longstanding precedent, this court applies the Rule 9(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).