Skip to main content

Hicks v. State

Citations

  • 434 A.2d 377
  • 1981 Del. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the “difficult question” presented to a trial court in attempting to protect the basic rights of a defendant who refuses the assistance of counsel
  • finding the trial court’s denial of a continuance request to allow the defendant to retain other counsel was not an abuse of discretion, because plaintiff had previously received an eleven week continuance and the second continuance was made right before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, McNeilly, Quillen, Horsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.