· 3/3/1989
Hicks v. Duckworth
Citations
- 708 F. Supp. 214
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2384
- 1989 WL 21086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that there must be “extrajudicial bias,” or “bias that is not derived from the evidence or conduct of the parties that the judge observes in the course of the proceedings”
- “[T]he judge’s rulings at trial do not constitute grounds for recusal because they can be corrected by reversal on appeal.”
- “Normally the judge’s rulings at trial do not constitute grounds for recusal because they can be corrected by reversal on appeal”
- issuance of control block to director
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.