Skip to main content
· 3/3/1989

Hicks v. Duckworth

Citations

  • 708 F. Supp. 214
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2384
  • 1989 WL 21086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that there must be “extrajudicial bias,” or “bias that is not derived from the evidence or conduct of the parties that the judge observes in the course of the proceedings”
  • “[T]he judge’s rulings at trial do not constitute grounds for recusal because they can be corrected by reversal on appeal.”
  • “Normally the judge’s rulings at trial do not constitute grounds for recusal because they can be corrected by reversal on appeal”
  • issuance of control block to director

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.