Skip to main content
· 8/25/1982

Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. Faulkner

Citations

  • 689 F.2d 100
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1229
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the requirements apply when affidavits are submitted along with motions to dismiss
  • adopting a “general rule” that a prisoner pro se plaintiff is “entitled to receive notice of the consequences of failing to respond with affidavits to a motion for summary judgment”
  • adopting a “general rule” that a prisoner pro se plaintiff is “entitled to receive notice of the consequences of failing to respond with affidavits to a motion for summary judgment”
  • Seventh Circuit suggests that the three state attorneys general in this circuit ought to assume the responsibility of notifying pro se prison litigants
  • “We leave for another day the possible extension of our new rule to other classes of pro se civil litigants”
  • pro se prisoner-plaintiff must be warned in plain English of consequences of fail- ing to respond properly to defendant’s motion for sum- mary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell, Bauer, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.