· 8/25/1982
Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. Faulkner
Citations
- 689 F.2d 100
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1229
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the requirements apply when affidavits are submitted along with motions to dismiss
- adopting a “general rule” that a prisoner pro se plaintiff is “entitled to receive notice of the consequences of failing to respond with affidavits to a motion for summary judgment”
- adopting a “general rule” that a prisoner pro se plaintiff is “entitled to receive notice of the consequences of failing to respond with affidavits to a motion for summary judgment”
- Seventh Circuit suggests that the three state attorneys general in this circuit ought to assume the responsibility of notifying pro se prison litigants
- “We leave for another day the possible extension of our new rule to other classes of pro se civil litigants”
- pro se prisoner-plaintiff must be warned in plain English of consequences of fail- ing to respond properly to defendant’s motion for sum- mary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pell, Bauer, Posner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.