Rosenthal v. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The judge rightly concluded, however, that D.C. Code § 15–109 (2001) barred the request because Rosenthal had not presented any claim for prejudgment interest to the trier of fact.”
• “A party is excused from performance under a contract if the other party is in material breach thereof.” (quoting BioLife Solutions, Inc. v. Endocare, Inc., 838 A.2d 268, 278 (Del. Ch. 2003))
• a party’s material breach excuses the nonbreaching party’s contractual obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).