Skip to main content

Herring v. State

Citations

  • 147 S.W.3d 390
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1649
  • 2004 WL 2248041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming court of appeals’s decision that assumed arguendo that trial court erred by refusing to exclude evidence of exact description of appellant’s prior crime during guilt-innocence and that then performed harm analysis
  • “While general criminality is a prohibited inference, it is not a strong or inflammatory an inference as the conformity inference that arises from substantially similar offenses . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.