McIlroy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no harm when “overwhelming evidence exists supporting McIlroy’s present conviction for possession of methamphetamine and for possession of a firearm by a felon”
• no harm when “overwhelming evidence exists supporting McIlroy’s present conviction for possession of methamphetamine and for possession of a firearm by a felon”
• no harm when “overwhelming evidence exists supporting McIlroy’s present conviction for possession of methamphetamine and for possession of a firearm by a felon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).