Skip to main content

Herrera v. State

Citations

  • 682 S.W.2d 313
  • 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even if trial court erred in admitting identification, there was overwhelming evidence showing appellant was perpetrator, making court’s error, if any, harmless beyond reasonable doubt
  • “[I]n-court identification will only be inadmissible if the State fails to show by clear and convincing evidence that the identification is not tainted”
  • adopting Wadefactors for purpose of assessing independent origin
  • adopting Wade factors for purpose of assessing independent origin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.