Knott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Implicit in that analysis [underEstelle ] is that jurors could recognize Knott’s garb as that of a prisoner.”
• \defendant ... who objects to being tried in prison attire before the jury has been impaneled is deemed to have objected in a timely manner and not to have waived his right to be tried in civilian clothing\
• “defendant . . . who objects to being tried in prison attire before the jury has been impaneled is deemed to have objected in a timely manner and not to have waived his right to be tried in civilian clothing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).