Skip to main content

Dixon v. State

Citations

  • 869 N.E.2d 516
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 1496
  • 2007 WL 2003136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that regardless of whether an officer served the defendant a physical copy of the protective order, explicit oral notice of the order was enough to show the defendant knowingly violated a protective order
  • holding that oral notice of a protective order may be sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yaidik, Robb, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.