Hernandez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it was admitted at oral argument that calling the technician would have “only further ‘prosecut[ed] our own client’ ”
• further noting that “[w]hen such witnesses are equally available to both parties, no inference should be drawn or comments made on the failure of either party to call the witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ubilla v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-22· cited 14×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-09· cited 4×
• Datilus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-23· cited 2×
• Representative Geraldine F. Thompson, etc. v. Governor Ron DeSantis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2020-08-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• Haliburton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 60×
• State v. Michaels
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-07-26· cited 25×
• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-20· cited 19×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-18· cited 17×
• German v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-13· cited 15×
• Delsol v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-25· cited 14×
• Mora v. Crosby
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-15· cited 11×
• Diaz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-13· cited 9×