Skip to main content
· 4/22/2009

Ubilla v. State

Citations

  • 8 So. 3d 1200
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3408
  • 2009 WL 1066117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the defendant's VCC sentence on theft count because theft does not qualify as a predicate offense or primary offense for VCC purposes
  • reversing VCC sentence for theft because it does not qualify as a primary offense for which a VCC sentence may be imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells, Rothenberg, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.