· 4/22/2009
Ubilla v. State
Citations
- 8 So. 3d 1200
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3408
- 2009 WL 1066117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing the defendant's VCC sentence on theft count because theft does not qualify as a predicate offense or primary offense for VCC purposes
- reversing VCC sentence for theft because it does not qualify as a primary offense for which a VCC sentence may be imposed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wells, Rothenberg, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.