Diaz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in a case involving non-consensual entry, \the `remaining in' language may be viewed as mere surplusage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ubilla v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-22· cited 14×
• Spikes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 6×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 5×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19· cited 4×
• Hernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-27· cited 4×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-09· cited 4×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-16· cited 2×
• Mullins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delgado v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-08-24· cited 99×
• Floyd v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-12· cited 66×
• Delsol v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-25· cited 14×
• Johnekins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07· cited 13×
• Valentine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-05· cited 10×