Skip to main content

Henley v. State

Citations

  • 729 So. 2d 232
  • 1998 WL 852584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that value is an essential element of grand larceny and that the 4 failure to prove value warrants reversal and remand for sentencing on petit larceny
  • noting whether “the 5 It was later determined that the race of one of the struck jurors (Juror 18
  • “Without evidence as to the value of the [stolen property], the State has failed to meet its burden of proof as to one of the elements of grand, larceny and conviction of same cannot be upheld.”
  • “Without evidence as to the value of the [stolen property], the 9 State has failed to meet its burden of proof as to one of the elements of grand larceny and conviction of same cannot be upheld.”
  • trial has discretion to determine whether hybrid representation is appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.