Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 910 S.W.2d 656
  • 322 Ark. 402
  • 1995 Ark. LEXIS 658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof regarding the defendant’s travel with a prosecution witness to Louisiana on the day set for trial was relevant circumstantial evidence of his knowledge or consciousness of guilt and was not unfairly prejudicial
  • “Certainly a factfinder is entitled to know whether a defendant attempted to thwart his prosecution by secreting a witness who had implicated him in the charged offense.”
  • evidence of witness tampering was held to be relevant and strongly probative of defendant’s knowledge or consciousness of guilt
  • evidence of witness tampering is evidence of bias and consciousness of guilt and is thus admissible
  • evidence of witness tampering is evidence of bias and consciousness of guilt and is thus admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Glaze, Newbern, Roaf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.