Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 347 S.W.3d 31
  • 2009 Ark. 483
  • 2009 Ark. LEXIS 654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n cases tried without a jury there is a presumption that a trial judge will consider only competent evidence. . . [which] is overcome only when there is an indication that the trial judge gave some consideration to the inadmissible evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim Gunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.