Supreme Court of Arkansas· 3/17/1997
Hicks v. State
Citations
- 941 S.W.2d 387
- 327 Ark. 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error where there was overwhelming evidence to support the conviction
- holding' that admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error when' there was overwhelming evidence to support the conviction
- Appellant cannot complain of error in the admission of testimony when he is the one who originally elicited the testimony.
- Appellant cannot complain of error in the admission of testimony when he is the one who originally elicited the testimony.
- the admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error where there was overwhelming evidence to support convictions for delivery of controlled substances and possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornton, Glaze, Newbern, Corbin, Brown, Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-02-05· cited 79×
- Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-06-12· cited 59×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-09-23· cited 36×
- Hathcock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-05-27· cited 32×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-05· cited 28×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-11-13· cited 27×
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-22· cited 23×
- Barr v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-01-28· cited 22×
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-09-23· cited 21×
- Saul v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-01-26· cited 20×
- Smart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-04-17· cited 19×
- Criddle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-10-14· cited 15×
- Mixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-09· cited 13×
- Danny Ray Henington v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-01-16· cited 13×
- Puckett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-05· cited 12×
- Darrell Dennis v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-01-23· cited 11×
- Tomboli v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2007-11-28· cited 9×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2019-04-18· cited 9×
- Lueken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2004-11-17· cited 8×
- Saul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-06-22· cited 8×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-01-10· cited 196×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-12-17· cited 150×
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-06-20· cited 119×
- United States v. Frank Williams, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1992-04-01· cited 118×
- Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-09-20· cited 74×
- Abdullah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-01-29· cited 62×
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-02-19· cited 60×
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-06-20· cited 59×
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-03-07· cited 42×
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-01-27· cited 42×
- Ravellette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-10-09· cited 42×
- United States v. Jose Oscar CantuFifth Circuit· 1989-06-23· cited 38×
- Bliss v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-04-30· cited 36×
- Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-10-11· cited 35×
- Darrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-10-30· cited 35×
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-05-16· cited 35×
- Grinning v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-10-09· cited 31×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-09-16· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.