Skip to main content

Hicks v. State

Citations

  • 941 S.W.2d 387
  • 327 Ark. 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error where there was overwhelming evidence to support the conviction
  • holding' that admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error when' there was overwhelming evidence to support the conviction
  • Appellant cannot complain of error in the admission of testimony when he is the one who originally elicited the testimony.
  • Appellant cannot complain of error in the admission of testimony when he is the one who originally elicited the testimony.
  • the admission of additional drug paraphernalia was harmless error where there was overwhelming evidence to support convictions for delivery of controlled substances and possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thornton, Glaze, Newbern, Corbin, Brown, Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.