Fifth Circuit· 4/13/2005

Henderson v. Stalder

Citations

407 F.3d 351
16 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 787
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6069
2005 WL 845913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the district court’s decision on remand to allow an amended complaint to add new claims and a new party in an effort to cure standing issue violated the mandate rule
plaintiffs’ challenge to Lousiana’s “Choose Life” license plate barred by the Tax Injunction Act
“Where, as here, further proceedings in the district court are specified in the mandate of the Court of Appeals, the district court is limited to holding such as are directed.” (quoting Crowe v. Smith, 261 F.3d 558, 562 (5th Cir. 2001))
“Where, as here, further proceedings in the district court are specified in the mandate of the Court of Appeals, the district court is limited to holding such as are directed.” (quoting Crowe v. Smith, 261 F.3d 558, 562 (5th Cir. 2001))
conclud- ing that the additional charges for speciality plates are taxes because they “sustain[ ] the essential flow of revenue to the government,” are “imposed by a state or municipal legisla- ture,” and are “designed to provide a benefit for the entire community”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Jones, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.