Arizona Life Coalition Inc. v. Stanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that speech opposing abortion is not speech that promotes faith or a specific religion
• holding that the denial of a specialty license plate application on the basis that the government chose not to enter the Choose Life/Pro-Choice debate was viewpoint discriminatory
• holding that the denial of a specialty license plate application on the basis that the government chose not to enter the Choose Life/Pro-Choice debate was viewpoint discriminatory
• explaining that the extra amount charged for a “special organization [license] plate” is not a tax because the government does not require a special plate
• striking down Arizona’s custom plate program and noting the “potential constitutional problems when government officials are given unbridled discretion in regulating speech, even in limited public fora”
• striking down Arizona’s custom 9 plate program and noting the “potential constitutional problems when government 10 officials are given unbridled discretion in regulating speech, even in limited public 11 fora”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).