Helga M. Glock v. Glock, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ex-wife filed the § 1782 proceeding to obtain discovery for use in her Austrian divorce
• “[W]e find nothing in the language of [section] 1782 that purports to limit later uses of evidence that have been properly obtained under [section] 1782.”
• “[W]e find nothing in the language of § 1782 that purports to limit later uses of evidence that have been properly obtained under § 1782.”
• “A district court abuses its discretion if it applies an incorrect legal standard . . . .” (quoting FTC v. AbbVie Prods. LLC, 713 F.3d 54, 61 (11th Cir. 2013))
• “We review an order interpreting a protective order for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).