Helga M. Glock v. Glock, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ex-wife filed the § 1782 proceeding to obtain discovery for use in her Austrian divorce
• “[W]e find nothing in the language of [section] 1782 that purports to limit later uses of evidence that have been properly obtained under [section] 1782.”
• “[W]e find nothing in the language of § 1782 that purports to limit later uses of evidence that have been properly obtained under § 1782.”
• “A district court abuses its discretion if it applies an incorrect legal standard . . . .” (quoting FTC v. AbbVie Prods. LLC, 713 F.3d 54, 61 (11th Cir. 2013))
• “We review an order interpreting a protective order for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Democratic Executive Committee of Florida v. Laurel M. Lee
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-02-15· cited 56×
• Teresa Taylor v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-10-08· cited 44×
• Gissendaner v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-09-29· cited 41×
• Anna Aleksandrovna Sergeeva v. Tripleton International Limited
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 34×
• Accent Delight International Ltd. v. Adelson
  Second Circuit· 2017-08-28· cited 29×
• Department of Caldas v. Diageo PLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2019-06-03· cited 9×
• Kelly Gissendaner v. Commissioner, GA DOC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-09-29
• Application of Lucille Holdings Pte Ltd Under 28 U.S.C. 1782 v. Edge Funds Management LLC
  District of Columbia· 2022-05-05
• Novalpina Capital Partners I Gp S.A.R.L v. Read
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-08-12

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kastigar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
• Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 433×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Abbvie Products LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2013-03-21· cited 117×
• United Kingdom v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 2001-01-19· cited 100×
• In Re: Patricio Clerici
  Eleventh Circuit· 2007-03-21· cited 66×
• In Re Letter of Request From the Crown Prosecution Service of the United Kingdom, Thomas J. Ward
  D.C. Circuit· 1989-03-17· cited 49×
• In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, Plaintiff
  Second Circuit· 1992-05-05· cited 41×
• Application of Consorcio Equatoriano De Telecomunicaciones S.A. v. Jet Air Service Equador S.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2014-01-10· cited 40×
• United States v. Schwartz
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-09-05· cited 36×
• Glendale Owens v. Samkle Automotive Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-09-23· cited 30×
• In Re Letter Rogatory From the Justice Court, District of Montreal, Canada. Appeal of John Fecarotta
  Sixth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 26×
• United States v. Pleau
  First Circuit· 2012-05-21· cited 17×