Glendale Owens v. Samkle Automotive Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• broadly construing the Act to provide enhanced damages where plaintiff did not allege intent to defraud with respect to mileage but rather with respect to the identity of the vehicle’s prior owner
• “[T]he necessary elements required for a private cause of action pursuant to this statute [are]: (1) that the defendant violated the Act or its regulations, (2) with intent to defraud.”
• “[T]he necessary elements required for 3 Serra first brought its claims against Mr. Burt in January 2024. (Doc. 2). In March 2024, Mr. Burt filed a pro se answer setting out his position about what happened to the car. (Doc. 5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).