Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/27/1963
Heidorn Appeal
Citations
- 412 Pa. 570
- 195 A.2d 349
- 1963 Pa. LEXIS 466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- knowledge of open and conspicuous zoning ordinance violation would be imputed to municipality for purposes of determining whether municipality acted with due diligence in attempting to enforce ordinance
- knowledge of open and conspicuous zoning ordinance violation would be imputed to municipality for purposes of determining whether municipality acted with due diligence in attempting to enforce ordinance
- municipality estopped by laches from enforcing zoning restriction
- municipality estopped by laches from enforcing zoning restriction
- landowner had reasonable belief use was nonconforming
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Bell, Musmánno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 77×
- Nettleton v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-22· cited 61×
- Weinberg v. Commonwealth, State Board of Examiners of Public AccountantsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-27· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. FlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-24· cited 44×
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-02-14· cited 32×
- Xanthos v. Bd. of Adjustment of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 28×
- Knake v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-11· cited 22×
- In Re Appeal of CrawfordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-02· cited 21×
- Ignelzi v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-06· cited 21×
- City of Beech Grove v. SchmithIndiana Court of Appeals· 1975-06-19· cited 20×
- Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-02-01· cited 20×
- Marzo v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-05-18· cited 17×
- Draving v. Lower Southampton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-02-01· cited 16×
- Springfield Township v. KimCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-04· cited 14×
- Dewald v. BD. OF ADJUST., CITY OF PGH.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-12· cited 13×
- Cohen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-31· cited 13×
- Bevans v. Township of HilltownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-22· cited 13×
- Jackson v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Ex Rel. City of KenaiAlaska Supreme Court· 1987-03-06· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. HarchelroadCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-03-17· cited 11×
- Zoning Hearing Board v. PetroskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-21· cited 11×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-04-26· cited 204×
- Stahl v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-06-04· cited 56×
- Yocum Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-05-26· cited 35×
- Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 19×
- Fagan v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-05-27· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.