Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/26/1957
Archbishop O'Hara's Appeal
Citations
- 389 Pa. 35
- 131 A.2d 587
- 1957 Pa. LEXIS 337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expense of municipal improvements which would be required if special exception granted is not relevant to the police power standard upon which the court must rely in granting or denying a special exception
- expense of municipal improvements which would be required if special exception granted is not relevant to the police power standard upon which the court must rely in granting or denying a special exception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno, Arnold, Cohen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
162 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-11-09· cited 226×
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 179×
- Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-17· cited 173×
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-02-13· cited 167×
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-05-02· cited 155×
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-02-24· cited 148×
- Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v. Allegheny County Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-06-30· cited 140×
- Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 139×
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-05-11· cited 125×
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-14· cited 106×
- Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-01-06· cited 98×
- DePAUL v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 89×
- Council of Middletown Township v. BenhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-23· cited 79×
- Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lower Moreland Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-15· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 73×
- Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-03-16· cited 67×
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Life FellowshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-07· cited 65×
- Commercial Properties, Inc. v. PeternelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-06-30· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. KindnessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 61×
- Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-30· cited 58×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 1,089×
- Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court· 1933-05-08· cited 338×
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court· 1921-11-02· cited 280×
- New York Central Securities Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 268×
- Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 258×
- United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co.Supreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 247×
- Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-06-27· cited 164×
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-06-27· cited 136×
- Holgate Bros. v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1938-06-30· cited 106×
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 92×
- Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-24· cited 89×
- Rolling Green Golf Club CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-06-26· cited 80×
- Volpe AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-03-13· cited 73×
- Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-03-29· cited 73×
- Lukens v. Ridley Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-05-23· cited 72×
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard LakeMichigan Supreme Court· 1952-05-16· cited 59×
- GRATTON v. CONTESupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-05-22· cited 50×
- Lindquist AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-05-22· cited 49×
- Garbev Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-05-21· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. FranklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-11-12· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.