In Re Appeal of Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though appellants spent substantial funds on improvements, they would suffer no hardship if the variance was denied because the garage and other improvements erected were consistent with permitted residential use
• even though appellants spent substantial funds on improvements, they would suffer no hardship if the variance was denied because the garage and other improvements erected were consistent with permitted residential use
• “[I]n assessing whether a landowner’s reliance upon municipal inaction is reasonable, a landowner is, absent some municipal validation of the use, ‘duty[-]bound to check the zoning status of the property before purchase.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).