Skip to main content

Heard v. State

Citations

  • 697 S.E.2d 811
  • 287 Ga. 554
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2323
  • 2010 Ga. LEXIS 546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for severance when verdict, including acquittal for some charges, showed the jury understood law and evidence
  • holding that the absence of the appellant’s mother “was a factor for the trial court to consider, but it was not determinative on the issue of voluntariness” of his Miranda waiver
  • holding that deciding which witnesses to call is a strategic decision
  • noting that “the concept of immediate presence is broadly construed if the object taken was under the victim’s control or responsibility and the victim is not too distant”
  • finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for severance, noting that “the verdict itself, including [appellant’s] acquittal for some of the charges, shows that the jury fully understood the law and evidence”
  • finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for severance, noting that “the verdict itself, including [appellant’s] acquittal for some of the charges, shows that the jury fully understood the law and evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.