Lillard v. Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a will contained an in terrorem clause but holding that the evidence was legally sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict that the will was the product of undue influence
• noting relevance of isolating the testator and preventing unsupervised visits
• noting relevance of the propounders’ conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).