Fourth Circuit· 1/21/2009
Pressley v. Tupperware Long Term Disability Plan
Citations
- 553 F.3d 334
- 45 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2399
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 995
- 2009 WL 131132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaching a decision at odds with unpublished precedent, noting that “[w]e . . . are not bound by” unpublished precedent, and “‘we ordinarily do not accord precedential value to our unpublished decisions.’”
- applying the “basic principle of statutory construction that when two statutes are in conflict, a specific statute closely applicable to the substance of the controversy at hand controls over a more generalized provision.”
- “‘[W]here facts sufficient to rule on an affirmative defense’—including ‘the defense that the plaintiff’s claim is time-barred’—‘are alleged in the complaint, the defense may be reached by a motion to dismiss filed under Rule 12(b)(6).” (quoting Goodman, 494 F.3d at 464)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Duncan, Smith, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J. DeMasters v. Carilion ClinicFourth Circuit· 2015-08-10· cited 207×
- Brennan v. Deluxe Corp.D. Maryland· 2019-01-18· cited 83×
- Patricia Hentosh v. Old Dominion UniversityFourth Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 77×
- Gilbert v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2009-10-06· cited 66×
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.D. Maryland· 2019-03-31· cited 60×
- Edwards v. SchwartzW.D. Virginia· 2019-03-19· cited 34×
- Balt. Scrap Corp. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co.D. Maryland· 2019-06-17· cited 32×
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanN.D. Illinois· 2009-09-03· cited 24×
- Alyssa Reid v. James Madison UniversityFourth Circuit· 2024-01-09· cited 22×
- Strickland-Lucas v. Citibank, N.A.D. Maryland· 2017-06-09· cited 18×
- John Ham, Jr. v. Warden M. BreckonFourth Circuit· 2021-04-20· cited 16×
- Courtney-Pope v. Bd. of Educ. of Carroll Cnty.D. Maryland· 2018-01-19· cited 14×
- West v. J.O. Stevenson, Inc.E.D. North Carolina· 2016-02-24· cited 12×
- Delaney v. First Fin. of Charleston, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-05-08· cited 5×
- Walker v. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-12-08· cited 2×
- Fusaro v. DavittD. Maryland· 2018-09-04· cited 2×
- T.W. v. Hanover County Public SchoolsE.D. Virginia· 2012-09-28· cited 2×
- United States v. DedrickW.D. North Carolina· 2009-10-26· cited 1×
- Brown v. Rawlings Financial Services, LLCD. Connecticut· 2016-09-30
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 4,134×
- Goodman v. Praxair, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2007-07-25· cited 1,009×
- Charles F. Lambeth, Jr. Michael D. Lea v. The Board of Commissioners of Davidson County, North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2005-05-13· cited 678×
- Cochran v. MorrisFourth Circuit· 1996-01-26· cited 462×
- HCSC-Laundry v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 257×
- Q International Courier, Incorporated v. Glenn Smoak Jack L. Wuerker Brendan Kennedy Dennis Cornelius Tim Gay & Associates, PcFourth Circuit· 2006-03-20· cited 73×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 2007-04-26· cited 37×
- Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 29×
- Carbon Fuel Company v. USX CorporationFourth Circuit· 1996-11-18· cited 27×
- Almeda Farmer v. Employment Security Commission Of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1993-09-02· cited 19×
- Bryant v. Food Lion, Inc.D. South Carolina· 2000-05-26· cited 17×
- Ardis v. WardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 5×
- Montjoy v. One Stop of Abbeville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.