Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/18/1995

HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ap-pealable interlocutory injunctions are “de signed to ... protect ... the substantive relief sought by a complaint”
  • holding that appealable interlocutory injunctions are “designed to . . . protect . . . the substantive relief sought by a complaint”
  • holding that order that did not resolve all the claims in the action was interlocutory and was not appealable because there was no Rule 54(b) certification
  • holding that even “a transfer motivated by actual fraudulent intent may not be voided if a transferee who paid fair consideration did not have actual or constructive knowledge of such intent.”
  • concluding that, where a district court “enter[s] judgment without a trial on the basis of the affidavits and appended exhibits,” we review its decision under §5225(b) de novo
  • noting . that, “[u]nlike the Bankruptcy Code,” New York’s fraudulent conveyance statute comprises “a set of legal rather than equitable doctrines”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Jon, Newman, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

147 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.