Skip to main content
· 3/16/1984

Ballance v. State

Citations

  • 447 So. 2d 974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • before payment schedule is adopted by court, defendant must be afforded the opportunity to be heard on his ability to comply therewith
  • although defendant was presently unable to pay restitution, court could still require defendant to be obligated for future payments
  • determination of restitution amount and defendant’s ability to pay are non-delegable judicial responsibilities
  • although defendant was presently unable to pay restitution, eourt could keep defendant “on the hook” and could require defendant to be obligated for future payments “at some appropriate period during the term of ... probation depending upon ... ability to pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nimmons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.