New Mexico Supreme Court· 3/15/1988
Hayes v. State
Citations
- 751 P.2d 186
- 106 N.M. 806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the filing requirements of SCRA 5-801 are jurisdictional so that motions must be filed within the time required
- holding that defendant is entitled to rely on trial court’s assurance that motion to modify sentence would be heard
- holding that the filing requirements of SCRA 5-801 are jurisdictional so that motions must be filed within the time required
- declaring that ninety days is a reasonable time for a court to decide a motion for modification of sentence
- stating that court must rule on motion to reduce sentence within a reasonable time and suggesting 90 days as a reasonable amount of time
- holding that the time requirement for filing a motion to modify sentence under Rule 5-801 NMRA is jurisdictional, although the trial court had discretion to hear and decide a timely filed motion after the expiration of the time limit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Scarborough, Stowers, Walters, Ransom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MorelandNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-05-09· cited 81×
- State v. HerbstmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-23· cited 42×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-01-11· cited 25×
- In re Michael L.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-30· cited 24×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-08-01· cited 23×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-06-14· cited 19×
- State v. NeelyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-05-18· cited 14×
- State v. RatchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-06-03· cited 13×
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-10-07· cited 10×
- State v. GaedeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-12-07· cited 9×
- In re Christobal V.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-30· cited 9×
- State v. Dylan A.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-20· cited 5×
- State v. JenkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-12-20· cited 5×
- State v. DYLAN A.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-08-08· cited 4×
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-06-16· cited 4×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-02· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,450×
- Brazas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 40×
- Thomas D. Gaertner v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1985-07-11· cited 27×
- Sotto v. WainwrightFifth Circuit· 1979-08-22· cited 15×
- State v. SykesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.