Skip to main content

In re Michael L.

Citations

  • 132 N.M. 479
  • 2002 NMCA 076
  • 50 P.3d 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that interpretation of a statute is a question of law reviewed de novo
  • stating that interpretation of a statute is a question of law reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarid, Bosson, Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.