Skip to main content
· 10/15/1987

Hatchard v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.

Citations

  • 532 A.2d 346
  • 516 Pa. 184
  • 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2000
  • 1987 Pa. LEXIS 802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the purpose of the Pennsylvania Shield Law is not furthered by protecting from discovery information in the possession of the media where disclosure would not reveal a confidential source
  • obvious purpose of Shield Law is to permit free flow of information to news media
  • although 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5942 provides absolute privilege of confidential communication between media and informant, protection not attaching to non-confidential material in defamation case
  • obvious purpose of Shield Law is to permit free flow of information to news media
  • although 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5942 provides absolute privilege of confidential communication between media and informant, protection not attaching to non-confidential material in defamation case
  • regarding continuing viability of Taylor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos, Larsen, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.