· 10/15/1987
Hatchard v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.
Citations
- 532 A.2d 346
- 516 Pa. 184
- 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2000
- 1987 Pa. LEXIS 802
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the purpose of the Pennsylvania Shield Law is not furthered by protecting from discovery information in the possession of the media where disclosure would not reveal a confidential source
- obvious purpose of Shield Law is to permit free flow of information to news media
- although 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5942 provides absolute privilege of confidential communication between media and informant, protection not attaching to non-confidential material in defamation case
- obvious purpose of Shield Law is to permit free flow of information to news media
- although 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5942 provides absolute privilege of confidential communication between media and informant, protection not attaching to non-confidential material in defamation case
- regarding continuing viability of Taylor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos, Larsen, McDermott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.