Wilson v. Slatalla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the state of plaintiffs domicile generally has the greatest concern in vindicating plaintiffs good name and providing compensation for harm caused by defamatory publication”
• holding private plaintiff to a negligence standard of fault where the implication from an article was capable of a defamatory meaning
• explaining that “the state of plaintiffs domicile generally has the greatest concern in vindicating plaintiffs good name and providing compensation for harm caused by defamatory publication”
• relying on Pennsylvania law in reasoning negligence standard applied to private figure plaintiff allegedly defamed on matter of public importance
• \the public scrutiny rationale and the public's interest in the sentencing of convicted criminals support the application of the privilege to the presentence report\
• “the public scrutiny rationale and the public’s interest in the sentencing of convicted criminals support the application of the privilege to the presentence report”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).