Skip to main content
· 4/20/1992

Pennsylvania Bar Ass'n v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 607 A.2d 850
  • 147 Pa. Commw. 351
  • 1992 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Hatehard court held that Shield Law could not be interpreted to shield information that could not possibly lead to discovery of the identity of the confidential source
  • noting that Hatchard court held that Shield Law could not be interpreted to shield information that could not possibly lead to discovery of the identity of the confidential source
  • recognizing the right to reputation as a fundamental right under the state constitution
  • granting summary relief when the moving party showed that the case was clear and free from doubt, no issues of genuine material fact existed to be tried and it was entitled to relief as a matter of law
  • granting summary relief when the moving party showed that the case was clear and free from doubt, no issues of genuine material fact existed to be tried and it was entitled to relief as a matter of law
  • citizen cannot be deprived of state constitutional reputational interest “without a meaningful opportunity to be heard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Doyle, Colins, Palladino, McGinley, Smith, Pellegrini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.