Ray B. Woodbury v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining why \we do not think that [Aleutco ] is really contrary to our views.\
• explaining why “we do not think that [Aleutco] is really contrary to our views.”
• “we do not mean that no action will ever lie against the United States under the [FTCA] if a suit could be maintained for breach of contract upon the same facts”
• “the Tort Claims Act ‘should be construed to fit, so far as will comport with its words, into the entire statutory system of remedies against the Government to make a workable, consistent and equitable whole.’ ”
• indicating disagreement with district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).