Solomond v. Ball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[d]etermination of support awards must be based on contemporary circumstances” (quoting Keyser v. Keyser, 2 Va. App. 459, 461 (1986))
• reversing support decree which ordered father to pay a percentage of children’s education expenses, rather than a specific amount
• reversing support decree which ordered father to pay a percentage of children's education expenses, rather than a specific amount
• “A trial court may not abrogate its responsibility to determine that a material change of circumstance justifies a modification of child support by entering an order that results in an automatic increase in the support obligation upon the occurrence of future events.”
• \A trial court may not abrogate its responsibility to determine that a material change of circumstance justifies a modification of child support by entering an order that results in an automatic increase in the support obligation upon the occurrence of future events.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).