Hassell v. Wenglinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, was an “owner” under the Act when she was injured while walking the defendant’s dog
• holding that the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant, was an “owner” under the Act when she was injured while walking the defendant’s dog
• dog owner not liable for injuries to person who was walking dog as favor to the owner
• dog owner not liable for injuries to person who was walking dog as favor to the owner
• dog owner not liable for injuries to person walking dog as favor to owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).