Carl v. Resnick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the Illinois Equine Act would bar actions in which the plaintiff was engaged in an \ 'equine activity' \ that would have previously been permitted under the Animal Control Act
• because plaintiff neither exercised control over horse that kicked her as she was riding a different horse nor had any contractual relationship with the defendant owner of the kicking horse, she could maintain a claim under the Animal Control Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).