Eyrich v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• owner of boar not liable for injury to farmhand whose job was to care for and feed the boar
• owner of boar not liable for injury to farmhand whose job was to care and feed the boar
• owner of boar not liable for injury to farmhand whose job was care and feeding of boar
• the Act was construed to deny a recovery to an animal’s owner
• the Act was construed to deny a recovery to an animal's owner
• where plaintiff was an experienced farmhand and it was undisputed that part of his job was to care for the boar that attacked him, farmhand was “clearly not the type of plaintiff that the legislature intended to protect under the Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).