Hartwell v. Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that W. Va. Code § 33-6-21 proscribes “retroactive annulment of insurance policy after the occurrence of an incident for which the insured may incur liability, impliedly 9 binding insurer as of the date of the accident”
• upholding service of process on defendant’s insurer as non-violative of Due Process and discussing how service on insurer can only be utilized upon demonstration of failed efforts to effectuate service through statutorily-provided procedures
• \`It is a well established principle that this Court will not decide nonjurisdictional questions which have not been raised in the court below.'\ (citations omitted)
• \‘It is a well established principle that this Court will not decide nonjuris-dictional questions which have not been raised in the court below.’ \ (citations omitted)
• “This state’s interest in the just compensation of its citizens for injuries received in motor vehicle accidents is evidenced by the requirement that all insurance policies issued or delivered in this state provide uninsured motorist coverage[.]” (citations omitted)
• \This state's interest in the just compensation of its citizens for injuries received in motor vehicle accidents is evidenced by the requirement that all insurance policies issued or delivered in this state provide uninsured motorist coverage[.]\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).