West Virginia Human Rights Commission v. Garretson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that in matters of equity “[o]ther time restraints may be relevant in determining the extent to which a claimant is entitled to equitable remedies”
• noting that “we may affirm a circuit court’s dismissal order under any independently sufficient grounds.”
• “Interpreting a statute presents a purely legal question subject to our de novo review on which neither party bears the burden of proof.”
• stating “[a] statute is interpreted on the plain meaning of its provision in the statutory context, informed when necessary by the policy that the statue was designed to serve”
• “Interpreting a statute presents a purely legal question subject to our de novo review_”
• in matters of equity \[o]ther time restraints may be relevant in determining the extent to which a claimant is entitled to equitable remedies\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).