Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 4/29/2004
Hartman v. State
Citations
- 144 S.W.3d 568
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 3740
- 2004 WL 903878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that delay while awaiting arrival of video camera to record DWI investigation, as per department policy, was for legitimate law enforcement purposes
- noting, in upholding reasonableness of detention despite delay, that “Officer Smith followed police department procedure and was not dilatory in his investigation”
- “Reasonable purposes include investigation, maintenance of the status quo, and officer safety, considering the totality of the circumstances.”
- “An investigative detention requires an actual investigation; where no investigation is undertaken, the detention cannot be considered investigatory and rises to the level of an arrest.”
- five-to fifteen-minute delay to await arrival of video camera
- five-to fifteen-minute delay to await arrival of video camera
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Law, Kidd, Puryear
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-04-07· cited 43×
- Belcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-12-20· cited 40×
- Myers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-09-07· cited 33×
- State of Tennessee v. Mechelle L. MontgomeryTennessee Supreme Court· 2015-03-27· cited 20×
- Brent Corwin Bullock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-11-21· cited 16×
- Boyd v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-02-07· cited 10×
- Roland A. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-06-02· cited 3×
- Christopher Norris Cagle v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2016-12-29· cited 2×
- Alyssa Pullen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-08-26
- Alyssa Pullen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-20
- Brett Belcher v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-12-20
- David Allen Cronin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-09-23
- Frank Dickson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-12-06
- Timmie Lynn Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-03-07
- Mark A. McAdoo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2009-06-10
- Robert W. Sykora v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-02-22
- David Edward Myers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-09-07
- Derrick Shane Boyd v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-08-31
- Rafael Javier Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-04-07
- John Mark Evans v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2011-11-30
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-11-29· cited 3,729×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-26· cited 3,205×
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,970×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-04· cited 1,223×
- Balentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-03· cited 883×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-15· cited 525×
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-04-30· cited 471×
- Josey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-10-22· cited 177×
- Burkes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-20· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.